Skip to content
London VIP Choice

Tetris Couldn't Succeed at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

As any prominent honors show nears, one notices a demand for the addition fresh award types to honor unsung work and delight the spirits of followers who have specialized interests.

Another commentator previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, which is someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize because like all dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification backing this proposal is the most urgent above others. Here's the proposal: We need a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why film award organizations don’t do it. However, it represents an essential concession for the industry of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse they barely qualify a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to be recognized, and to ensure all game types to have a chance for representation, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards currently feature genre categories for Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these award types effectively encompass a lot of ground, making space possible for numerous titles.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere for their placement. Think about these this year’s best games, all very different: building puzzles in a particular game, intense tile-matching from another release, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles published annually that have no home during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive independent game categories.

  • A renowned logic title got overlooked in any category that year
  • A different innovative game received no nominations that year
  • Popular arranging title was overlooked recently
  • Limited numbers of puzzle games barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Significance of Puzzle Games

Frequently they represent compact experiences, yet the craft of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among the most-played games worldwide and have been for over a decade.

The famous puzzle experience challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of best-selling game of all time; it also contends for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, and engaging with diverse game types.

The Solution and Justification

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. You could fill a field of five with fascinating, diverse, deserving games each ceremony simply — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories in important events. Puzzle game makers are working at the challenging frontier of video game design, creating some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Just like cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.

CS
Written by

Christopher Stanton

Eleanor Whitmore is a luxury travel writer based in London, exploring the city's finest offerings.

London VIP Choice

Type to search articles.